NASHVILLE (BP) — Despite a Washington Post article suggesting Southern Baptist Convention Executive Committee President Frank S. Page could ask Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission President Russell Moore to resign amid ongoing controversy, the two SBC entity leaders reported a collegial meeting today (March 13) and said they “fully support one another.”
Earlier in the day, amid a social media flurry following the Post’s report, Page told Baptist Press he planned on “bridge-building” with Moore with no anticipation of requesting a resignation.
The Post reporter who broke news the meeting would occur, Sarah Pulliam Bailey, tweeted in clarification less than two hours after her story was published, “Nothing in my story suggests Moore might be fired. SBC dynamics are more complicated. [Plus] the story is complicated (surprise!)”
The meeting between Page and Moore came less than a month after the Executive Committee launched a study of churches’ escrowing Cooperative Program money and two months after Dallas-area Prestonwood Baptist Church announced it would escrow CP funds over “various significant positions taken by the leadership of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission.” The EC has received reports of similar actions by other churches.
Churches have expressed concern about alleged disrespectfulness by Moore toward evangelical supporters of President Trump and about a friend of the court brief signed by the ERLC in support of a New Jersey Islamic society’s right to build a mosque.
Following their two-hour meeting at the SBC Building in Nashville, Page and Moore said in a joint statement, “We met as colleagues committed to the same priorities of proclaiming the Gospel to every man, woman, boy and girl while also addressing biblical and Gospel issues on a wide range of topics to a culture that seems to have lost its way — issues ranging from religious liberty and racial reconciliation to Kingdom diversity and the sanctity of human life from the womb to the grave.
“We deepened our friendship and developed mutual understanding on ways we believe will move us forward as a network of churches. We fully support one another and look forward to working together on behalf of Southern Baptists in the years to come. We will collaborate on developing future steps to deepen connections with all Southern Baptists as we work together to advance the Great Commission of our Lord Jesus Christ,” Page and Moore stated.
Prior to the meeting, The Post reported — under a headline that asked “Could Southern Baptist Russell Moore lose his job?” — that a meeting between Page and Moore was to occur March 13. Page declined to discuss specific plans for the meeting with The Post and told Bailey he hoped Moore and his opponents would pursue reconciliation.
Page told Baptist Press he had “requested a private meeting with Dr. Moore” last week and that Bailey apparently became aware of the meeting.
When Bailey called Page on March 12, “I insisted that the meeting with Dr. Moore was a private meeting intended to seek bridge-building strategies,” Page said, acknowledging that “nothing was off the table” in his efforts to facilitate reconciliation within the convention.
“I also informed [Bailey] that I have no authority over Dr. Moore; that is vested in his board of trustees,” Page said, adding his desire for the meeting was “to find bridge-building solutions to an unnecessary divide that has been created across the landscape of our Southern Baptist network of churches.”
Ken Barbic, chairman of the ERLC’s board of trustees, told The Post, “Russell Moore is a Gospel-centered, faithful, and prophetic voice for Southern Baptists.” Barbic and the board “wholeheartedly support [Moore’s] leadership.”
An EC ad hoc committee has begun work to “study and recommend redemptive solutions to the current reality in Southern Baptist life of churches’ either escrowing or discontinuing Cooperative Program funds, with the report being brought back to the September 2017 Executive Committee meeting,” according to a motion unanimously adopted in February by the EC’s CP Committee.
Reprinted from Baptist Press (www.baptistpress.com), news service of the Southern Baptist Convention.
David Roach is chief national correspondent for Baptist Press.
by David Roach
NASHVILLE (BP) – With an ad hoc committee of the Southern Baptist Convention Executive Committee set to begin its study of churches’ escrowing Cooperative Program money, EC chairman Stephen Rummage says the study was occasioned in part by the notable volume of contacts the EC has received regarding the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission.
ERLC President Russell Moore told Baptist Press the entity is “a servant of our churches” and “happy to work with the Executive Committee.”
Meanwhile, Jack Graham, pastor of Dallas-area Prestonwood Baptist Church, told BP the congregation will conclude its internal study of giving to SBC causes before the convention’s June annual meeting in Phoenix. Prestonwood announced last month it would escrow CP funds over “various significant positions taken by the leadership of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission.” Prestonwood plans to continue cooperating with the SBC in some form, Graham, a former convention president, said via text message.
Other churches have taken or are considering similar action over concerns related to multiple SBC entities, according to reports received by the EC.
Rolland Slade, chairman of the EC’s CP Committee told BP today (March 6) the ad hoc study group will include 11 members : Slade, pastor of Meridian Baptist Church in El Cajon, Calif.; Rummage, pastor of Bell Shoals Baptist Church in Brandon, Fla.; EC vice chairman Shane Hall, pastor of First Southern Baptist Church in Oklahoma City; Dave Bryan, pastor of Chisholm Heights Baptist Church in Mustang, Okla.; Daniel Carr, pastor of Canaan Baptist Church in St. Louis; B. Scott Davis, pastor of Pitts Baptist Church in Concord, N.C.; Dale Jenkins, pastor of Airway Heights (Wash.) Baptist Church; Mike Lawson, pastor of First Baptist Church in Sherman, Texas; Glynn Rhinehart, a member of First Baptist Church in Youngsville, La.; Hoyt Savage, pastor of Foothills Baptist Church in Las Vegas; and Jared Wellman, pastor of Mission Dorado Baptist Church in Odessa, Texas.
The group’s initial meeting, Slade said, likely will occur via conference call. A date for the meeting will be calendared by March 18.
According to a motion unanimously adopted by the CP Committee last month, the study committee will “study and recommend redemptive solutions to the current reality in Southern Baptist life of churches’ either escrowing or discontinuing Cooperative Program funds, with the report being brought back to the September 2017 Executive Committee meeting.”
Slade said in an email the study committee “will discuss ways to discover whether escrowing CP funds is widespread and, if so, the reasons why; then we can begin to develop redemptive solutions to resolve the issues … We’ll likely look at this issue, share our findings with the [EC] officers and the CP Committee and then with the full EC.”
Slade said he will “stress with the group” that “this is first and foremost a Kingdom effort, not an effort to single out an individual, entity or point of view. What affects CP affects the work of Southern Baptists. We must be about sharing the Gospel to the world.”
Rummage told the SBC This Week podcast March 3 the ad hoc committee, and a separate study of SBC entities to be undertaken by the EC officers, is necessary because “a lot of … churches” have “concerns about some of the things that are happening in certain SBC entities. Specifically, some of the actions of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission have caused a lot of churches to respond and register concerns.”
Rummage added, “In fact, our Executive Committee staff tells me that they have received more letters, more calls, more emails [from] people who are considering defunding or holding back CP monies” over “this issue” than “from any other issue in memory.”
The ad hoc committee’s study will examine “the way our churches are responding” to all SBC entities, Rummage said, even though discussion of the ERLC “has surfaced most strongly” in recent months.
Roger S. Oldham, EC vice president for convention communications and relations, told BP the EC office has processed dozens of requests over the past year from churches seeking to withdraw from the SBC.
“Pastors seldom call or write the EC offices to express concerns about an entity, so when they do it is notable,” Oldham said in written comments. “Our practice is to refer them to the entity’s leaders or its trustees. In addition to numerous conversations with pastors expressing frustration or even threatening to withhold CP funds this past year, our office processed requests from 49 churches to withdraw from the convention, up from the half dozen or so we usually process in a given year. We grieve each time we send a notice to our entities that a church has voted to leave the convention.”
Moore told BP in written comments, “The ERLC could not do what it does without the sacrificial giving of churches, and there is hardly anything more foundational in our denomination than our Cooperative Program partnership, working together for the sake of Gospel advance.
“As a servant of our churches, we are happy to work with the Executive Committee, and more broadly, grateful to be able to serve our churches daily, whether by answering their questions, providing resources and assistance or standing alongside them in the public square contending for the fundamental issues of life, family and religious liberty,” Moore said.
Rummage expressed hope that churches’ concerns can be resolved.
A decision by Prestonwood to resume CP giving could indicate resolution of “most of the concerns that have been raised by the [Executive] Committee” because Prestonwood appears representative of other concerned congregations, Rummage said.
Graham told BP Prestonwood executive pastor Mike Buster “is chairing a study committee to evaluate our SBC giving” and the committee has “nothing to report” at present.
According to data from the SBC’s Annual Church Profile, Prestonwood has given $500,000 through CP each of the last three fiscal years for which data is available. The congregation has given approximately $500,000 each of those years through the Lottie Moon Christmas Offering for International Missions and $100,000 through the Annie Armstrong Easter Offering for North American Missions, according to ACP data.
Reprinted from Baptist Press (www.baptistpress.com), news service of the Southern Baptist Convention.
There are many Christian leaders who have expressed their belief that Americans are responsible for welcoming and absorbing many of the refugees and immigrants from the Muslim nations of the Middle East, even though our national security experts strongly oppose such a move based upon our inability to screen them. In addition, many of the Christian leaders who strongly advocate opening our borders seem to be ignoring the impact of Islamic immigration in Europe over the past few years, and especially what has been happening since the refugee crisis began. We have been told that if we do not bring in refugees then we are failing in our Christian responsibilities.
Our church has directly expressed our support to President Trump for his recent travel ban. We decided that we could not stand by silently while Dr. Russell Moore, as president of the ERLC, published an open letter to the President in disagreement of his policies on the refugee situation. He supported his position by referring to the 2016 resolution on refugees adopted by the SBC at its annual meeting.
When we study the Bible and examine what it says about immigration, sojourners, and foreigners living within host nations, we find that the issue is not as simple as many suggest. God clearly warned about the dangers of allowing foreigners to adversely impact Israel. Israel’s downfall came as the result of embracing the pagan gods of foreigners living within the land.
We believe, while the Bible tells us to show compassion to the sojourner and stranger, that God does not want us to be foolish and gullible, ignoring genuine dangers and consequences to our own nation in the process. The world is in crisis because we are in the last days. Our church and denomination are committed to evangelism to the Muslim world but it must be done with wisdom.
We have sent a letter to Dr. Moore, signed by the members of our congregation, expressing our disagreement with his stance and his use of the secular media to express his disagreement with the President.
Perhaps we are a minority in the Southern Baptist Convention, but we feel that since Dr. Moore and the ERLC has loudly voiced what is presented to be the official SBC position, it is our responsibility to express our direct disagreement. Neither Dr. Moore nor the ERLC speaks for us.
Perhaps many would consider us to be narrow-minded and nationalistic, but we consider ourselves evangelistic, caring, compassionate Christians who have determined that compassion is not best expressed by ignoring reality, nor at the cost of our responsibilities as Christian citizens. Sometimes we need to speak out even when our view may not be acceptable to others.
Dr. Russell Moore, President
The Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission
505 Second St., N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20002
February 26, 2017
Dear Dr. Moore,
Your recent open letter to President Trump and Vice President Pence, in which you presented your views about the travel ban, implies by its letterhead and your official position as the president of the ERLC, that your views are representative of the Southern Baptist Convention. Your letter therefore forces me, a pastor, along with the members of our Southern Baptist church, to enter the discussion and make it clear that you do not speak for us. Your public declarations through your letter as well as at other times make it necessary for us to make our views known in response. Our first response is to you directly.
We have neither the position, nor the desire, to present our views in the pages of a major newspaper as you have done. Instead, we will next begin to communicate on a smaller scale with the appropriate individuals and agencies that we feel should be contacted in order to make our views clear.
We are absolutely in favor of President Trump’s travel ban for both immediate security concerns for the United States, as well as in view of the obvious circumstances surrounding what is happening in Europe, particularly in connection with the refugee crisis. In spite of the very loud voices that condemn anyone who expresses grave concerns about the direction and impact of Islam on the modern world, for anyone to deny that we need to be extremely cautious about the cultural, political, and spiritual influences of Islamic immigration is being willfully blind.
We are a mission-minded church, and by being in favor of both the temporary ban as well as strong vetting measures, does not mean that we are unkind, non-evangelistic, or unfaithful to the teachings and compassion of our Christian faith. On the contrary, we are genuinely concerned with national security, the ability to freely practice our faith, and the safety of Christians around the world including our missionaries. We also support effective evangelism to individual Muslims and to the Islamic world in general.
We are keenly aware of what is happening, and what has been happening, in the European and Middle Eastern world with respect to Muslim immigration and the refugee crisis. A basic premise of Islam is to expand and dominate. This is the driving force of ISIS and Jihad, as you know. In addition however to militant Jihad is the soft Jihad, as it has been called, wherein Islam is spread peacefully by population growth and territorial occupation and expansion. Europe is losing its western identity as the result of Islamic expansion. If we are concerned with evangelism, then we should be concerned as well with how Muslim expansion inhibits and destroys evangelism by its very nature. Christians are being persecuted and slaughtered in the Islamic world.
Those who have tried to promote increased immigration of Muslims into America have pointed out how unlikely it is that any of us will be killed by Islamic terrorists traveling in stealth as refugees. I would like to point out that the effectiveness of terrorism does not require a huge number of victims. What we are seeing is that a single terrorist, or small group, is effective according to the strategic location and circumstances of the target. We have learned from the events of 9-11 that a terror attack can include both number count and strategic location and impact, and that it can be accomplished by a small number of individuals with careful planning.
As Baptists, we are acutely aware of our history and of the sacrifices made for religious liberty. However, freedom of religion is not a tenet of Islam. The more Islam grows in America, the louder is the call for adoption of local Sharia law, and the greater is the actual threat to religious liberty in America itself. You have commented in the recent past about how Christians were betraying their beliefs by supporting Donald Trump. Would you not say that Americans are actually betraying themselves in the way they are ignoring and even embracing an Islamic threat to our beliefs and security in the name of political correctness and under the guise of compassion and religious liberty?
Our own government security experts have warned that it is impossible to properly vet the refugees from Syria and the mass of immigrants seeking Asylum. It is not an absence of compassion to use common sense. It is also not an act of Christian compassion to expose our nation to obvious danger when an adequate screening system is not possible or in place. Compassion must be guided by wisdom. Compassion that is not guarded by wisdom becomes gullibility.
This letter does not exhaust several concerns that we have about some of your comments and the direction of the ERLC. However, we believe that your public position is unrealistic and ignores many critical factors.
Thank you for giving your attention to this letter. It was not pleasant to write, and I am sure it is not pleasant to read. Please understand it is not written in animosity, but from great concern.
Yours in Christ,
Pastor Carter Corbrey, Th.M, Th.D.
Signed as well by the congregation of the First Southern Baptist Church:
Below is the letter that we, sent to President Trump and Vice-President Pence to let them know that we do not agree with the stance that Russell Moore, President of the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission (ERLC) of the Southern Baptist Convention.
President Donald Trump
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington DC 20500
Re: Support for Travel Ban
February 26, 2017
Dear President Trump and Vice President Pence,
Thank you for your tireless efforts to serve our country and keep the promises you made during the campaign. We appreciate the many changes you have already made, and actions you have taken to correct the nation’s direction and position, and return us to our traditional moral footing.
One of the main purposes behind this letter is to encourage you with our support for your stance on immigration and the travel ban on refugees and immigration from the seven nations of the Middle East.
We are a Southern Baptist church, and are in direct disagreement with the open letter recently written and publicly posted by Dr. Russell Moore of the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission (ERLC) of the Southern Baptist Convention. In addition, we consider great caution and limitations regarding Muslim immigration to be important and wise.
It would have been timelier to have written this letter two weeks ago, but we have been researching and discussing the actions of Dr. Moore and the ERLC and I wanted to formulate an appropriate letter to Dr. Moore and include a copy of that letter in our communication with you.
We are evaluating our relationship with the ERLC and will be contacting our denomination with our recommendations. Dr. Moore and the ERLC do not speak for all Southern Baptists.
We are praying for your protection and guidance.
Sincerely in our Lord Jesus Christ,
Pastor Carter Corbrey, Th.D., and the congregation of the First Southern Baptist Church of Versailles, Indiana.