There are many Christian leaders who have expressed their belief that Americans are responsible for welcoming and absorbing many of the refugees and immigrants from the Muslim nations of the Middle East, even though our national security experts strongly oppose such a move based upon our inability to screen them. In addition, many of the Christian leaders who strongly advocate opening our borders seem to be ignoring the impact of Islamic immigration in Europe over the past few years, and especially what has been happening since the refugee crisis began. We have been told that if we do not bring in refugees then we are failing in our Christian responsibilities.
Our church has directly expressed our support to President Trump for his recent travel ban. We decided that we could not stand by silently while Dr. Russell Moore, as president of the ERLC, published an open letter to the President in disagreement of his policies on the refugee situation. He supported his position by referring to the 2016 resolution on refugees adopted by the SBC at its annual meeting.
When we study the Bible and examine what it says about immigration, sojourners, and foreigners living within host nations, we find that the issue is not as simple as many suggest. God clearly warned about the dangers of allowing foreigners to adversely impact Israel. Israel’s downfall came as the result of embracing the pagan gods of foreigners living within the land.
We believe, while the Bible tells us to show compassion to the sojourner and stranger, that God does not want us to be foolish and gullible, ignoring genuine dangers and consequences to our own nation in the process. The world is in crisis because we are in the last days. Our church and denomination are committed to evangelism to the Muslim world but it must be done with wisdom.
We have sent a letter to Dr. Moore, signed by the members of our congregation, expressing our disagreement with his stance and his use of the secular media to express his disagreement with the President.
Perhaps we are a minority in the Southern Baptist Convention, but we feel that since Dr. Moore and the ERLC has loudly voiced what is presented to be the official SBC position, it is our responsibility to express our direct disagreement. Neither Dr. Moore nor the ERLC speaks for us.
Perhaps many would consider us to be narrow-minded and nationalistic, but we consider ourselves evangelistic, caring, compassionate Christians who have determined that compassion is not best expressed by ignoring reality, nor at the cost of our responsibilities as Christian citizens. Sometimes we need to speak out even when our view may not be acceptable to others.
Dr. Russell Moore, President
The Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission
505 Second St., N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20002
February 26, 2017
Dear Dr. Moore,
Your recent open letter to President Trump and Vice President Pence, in which you presented your views about the travel ban, implies by its letterhead and your official position as the president of the ERLC, that your views are representative of the Southern Baptist Convention. Your letter therefore forces me, a pastor, along with the members of our Southern Baptist church, to enter the discussion and make it clear that you do not speak for us. Your public declarations through your letter as well as at other times make it necessary for us to make our views known in response. Our first response is to you directly.
We have neither the position, nor the desire, to present our views in the pages of a major newspaper as you have done. Instead, we will next begin to communicate on a smaller scale with the appropriate individuals and agencies that we feel should be contacted in order to make our views clear.
We are absolutely in favor of President Trump’s travel ban for both immediate security concerns for the United States, as well as in view of the obvious circumstances surrounding what is happening in Europe, particularly in connection with the refugee crisis. In spite of the very loud voices that condemn anyone who expresses grave concerns about the direction and impact of Islam on the modern world, for anyone to deny that we need to be extremely cautious about the cultural, political, and spiritual influences of Islamic immigration is being willfully blind.
We are a mission-minded church, and by being in favor of both the temporary ban as well as strong vetting measures, does not mean that we are unkind, non-evangelistic, or unfaithful to the teachings and compassion of our Christian faith. On the contrary, we are genuinely concerned with national security, the ability to freely practice our faith, and the safety of Christians around the world including our missionaries. We also support effective evangelism to individual Muslims and to the Islamic world in general.
We are keenly aware of what is happening, and what has been happening, in the European and Middle Eastern world with respect to Muslim immigration and the refugee crisis. A basic premise of Islam is to expand and dominate. This is the driving force of ISIS and Jihad, as you know. In addition however to militant Jihad is the soft Jihad, as it has been called, wherein Islam is spread peacefully by population growth and territorial occupation and expansion. Europe is losing its western identity as the result of Islamic expansion. If we are concerned with evangelism, then we should be concerned as well with how Muslim expansion inhibits and destroys evangelism by its very nature. Christians are being persecuted and slaughtered in the Islamic world.
Those who have tried to promote increased immigration of Muslims into America have pointed out how unlikely it is that any of us will be killed by Islamic terrorists traveling in stealth as refugees. I would like to point out that the effectiveness of terrorism does not require a huge number of victims. What we are seeing is that a single terrorist, or small group, is effective according to the strategic location and circumstances of the target. We have learned from the events of 9-11 that a terror attack can include both number count and strategic location and impact, and that it can be accomplished by a small number of individuals with careful planning.
As Baptists, we are acutely aware of our history and of the sacrifices made for religious liberty. However, freedom of religion is not a tenet of Islam. The more Islam grows in America, the louder is the call for adoption of local Sharia law, and the greater is the actual threat to religious liberty in America itself. You have commented in the recent past about how Christians were betraying their beliefs by supporting Donald Trump. Would you not say that Americans are actually betraying themselves in the way they are ignoring and even embracing an Islamic threat to our beliefs and security in the name of political correctness and under the guise of compassion and religious liberty?
Our own government security experts have warned that it is impossible to properly vet the refugees from Syria and the mass of immigrants seeking Asylum. It is not an absence of compassion to use common sense. It is also not an act of Christian compassion to expose our nation to obvious danger when an adequate screening system is not possible or in place. Compassion must be guided by wisdom. Compassion that is not guarded by wisdom becomes gullibility.
This letter does not exhaust several concerns that we have about some of your comments and the direction of the ERLC. However, we believe that your public position is unrealistic and ignores many critical factors.
Thank you for giving your attention to this letter. It was not pleasant to write, and I am sure it is not pleasant to read. Please understand it is not written in animosity, but from great concern.
Yours in Christ,
Pastor Carter Corbrey, Th.M, Th.D.
Signed as well by the congregation of the First Southern Baptist Church: